View Full Version : NOVA vs. Modern Combat Sandstorm vs. Brothers In Arms 2
Fruho
02-21-2010, 11:20 PM
I have heard this question being asked all around the site so might as well make a thread. What do you think?
S.I.D. CrAzY
02-21-2010, 11:27 PM
NOVA is the only good one to me, couldn't stand MCS and I'm not loving BIA2 so far. Wasn't unexpected though, since I don't like most of GL's efforts.
xdanleex
02-21-2010, 11:29 PM
N.o.v.a. and modern combat sandstorm. U do know that it depends on wat kinds of fps you like. Past fps is brother in arm 2 because its in the past
Now fps is the modern combat sandstorm because its modern
future fps is N.ov.a. for being futuristic
To how much work i think they put in each game,
NOVA was the most work put in game, then modern combat sandstorm then BIA2
Fruho
02-21-2010, 11:41 PM
In case anybody is interested-- BiA 2 has already been hacked (check out the BiA 2 thread). Have fun playing your hacked multiplayer you guys I think I'll save my 8 bucks :)
Random_Guy
02-21-2010, 11:44 PM
Looks like few are likin' BIA2.
Austin:]
02-22-2010, 12:29 AM
Brothers In Arms 2 for the multiplayer, N.O.V.A. for graphics.
Austin:]
02-22-2010, 12:32 AM
In case anybody is interested-- BiA 2 has already been hacked (check out the BiA 2 thread). Have fun playing your hacked multiplayer you guys I think I'll save my 8 bucks :)
Already??? Man, I was looking forward to multiplayer:(
Random_Guy
02-22-2010, 03:43 AM
Same. That's a huge shame.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.