Sorry if I missed it but I didn't see this addressed anywhere, why was this new feature implemented, was it something to do with there being to many members. It was always helpful to see the signatures of members to know who is the developer, this isn't so much a problem on the computer as it is when I'm on my ipod and not logged in. Thanks
I would assume a sig is supposed to be a member's feature. So, they don't want it public (Arn and Blake that is) Just a thought.
This does appear to be a new development. It seems more likely an intentional decision than a bug. I suppose the upside is that developers can post promo codes in their sigs and only members will be privy to the free stuff.
I don't quite see the logic of it - if a sig is public enough for members to see, it can't really be anything that you wouldn't mind anyone seeing.