Playstation Vita Discussion Thread

[tygamr]

You forgot Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault on your list.

Also, FFX HD is not likely to be handled by Square-Enix in house with a large development team. The KH 1.5 compilation is being handled by only two programmers.

[skyye06]

Originally Posted by tygamr

You forgot Ratchet & Clank: Full Frontal Assault on your list.

Also, FFX HD is not likely to be handled by Square-Enix in house with a large development team. The KH 1.5 compilation is being handled by only two programmers.

I hope it gets sent to a good development team. One would think it wouldn't be that bad to just upscale, etc. but half the HD games have been either done well or really buggy.

[Teknikal]

Not that bothered what games come out this year although I'd still love to a realistic driving game and a well made FPS no doubt there will be a few titles that tempt me anyway.

Truthfully I've already bought to many I have plenty of games to keep me going I counted 18 and still intend to pick up Persona and WRC.
(count was including the 3 free AR game's, 1 mini and 1 PSP title though)

On another note I hate to admit it as I used to be good in the arcades but I'm getting owned online on Streetfighter x Tekken pretty badly although occasional lag is playing a part as well.

[LucianOrb]

Just finished (the 20+ endings of) Zero Escape: Virtue's Last Reward. This is now my favorite Vita game. Spectacular story, great characters, (mostly) clever puzzles. Definitely not for everyone, though, as it's much more of an interactive novel than a game, I must have spent three quarters of my total play time (~40 hours) reading dialogues.

[turkgames]

Originally Posted by Haruhi

Nothing at all.

Especially not Tearaway, Sly Cooper 4, Soul Sacrifice, Dead or Alive 5 Plus, Phantasy Star Online 2, Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, Earth Defense Force 2017 Portable, Gods Eater 2, Dragon's Crown, and Warrior's Lair.

Most of the games turn out to be not good or deserve the price we pay lately. AC3: Liberation and NFS:MW was cool but if they charge 40$ and even 50$ for games then they should release AAA games with better graphics or Vita sales will not go up. I also don't understand why Gameloft doesn't release their latest games like A7 and MC4 for Vita as well.

[Haruhi]

Originally Posted by turkgames

Most of the games turn out to be not good or deserve the price we pay lately. AC3: Liberation and NFS:MW was cool but if they charge 40$ and even 50$ for games then they should release AAA games with better graphics or Vita sales will not go up. I also don't understand why Gameloft doesn't release their latest games like A7 and MC4 for Vita as well.

If you don't think they're worth the money, then just don't buy them. It's funny that you mentioned Gameloft when Asphalt Injection and Dungeon Hunter Alliance are probably the biggest offenders. $7 on iOS, $15 on PS3, and $30 on Vita. No thanks.

[Teknikal]

Originally Posted by turkgames

Most of the games turn out to be not good or deserve the price we pay lately. AC3: Liberation and NFS:MW was cool but if they charge 40$ and even 50$ for games then they should release AAA games with better graphics or Vita sales will not go up. I also don't understand why Gameloft doesn't release their latest games like A7 and MC4 for Vita as well.

It might take gamecards with more space before we see what the vitas really capable off I kind of suspect that might be the limiting factor as the Vitas actually got two very big advantages over the PS3 in hardware.

To explain myself the Vita has double the Ram and a GPU that's about 20% more capable than it's big brother, the PS3 does have the cell processor though so it's still ahead but not by as far as most people think and it's debatable how much the cell is actually used in games.

I do think we need less b-class developers taking titles in the meantime.

[JBRUU]

Originally Posted by Teknikal

It might take gamecards with more space before we see what the vitas really capable off I kind of suspect that might be the limiting factor as the Vitas actually got two very big advantages over the PS3 in hardware.

To explain myself the Vita has double the Ram and a GPU that's about 20% more capable than it's big brother, the PS3 does have the cell processor though so it's still ahead but not by as far as most people think and it's debatable how much the cell is actually used in games.

I do think we need less b-class developers taking titles in the meantime.

II read in an article about the development of NFS vita that apparently the devs had to cut back on some stuff because the vita wasn't as powerful as they originally thought.

[Teknikal]

Originally Posted by JBRUU

II read in an article about the development of NFS vita that apparently the devs had to cut back on some stuff because the vita wasn't as powerful as they originally thought.

I suspect they just haven't it all figured it out yet it's their first Vita title and it takes time for developers to get the most out of things, I think the Vitas plenty powerful for a handheld although if it's like the PSP we probably won't see it's best until near the end of it's life.

I'm mostly happy with the titles so far, just think a few of them were given low budgets and rushed.

[turkgames]

Originally Posted by Haruhi

If you don't think they're worth the money, then just don't buy them. It's funny that you mentioned Gameloft when Asphalt Injection and Dungeon Hunter Alliance are probably the biggest offenders. $7 on iOS, $15 on PS3, and $30 on Vita. No thanks.

I don't say that they should release at that price but they can release them for like 10$ and I'm sure they can get some good. Playing MC4 is hard on a touch screen phone. I am expecting much more graphics now cause Apple started to speed up the business with iPhone 5 and iPad 4 yet still iPad 3 exclusive games didn't release yet