Spellsword -(by Everplay)[Universal] - Page 16

Jdragoon19 · #**151** 04-26-2012, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benegesserit

This game owns. Best 99c I've spent in months.

+1 100% agree! This game is my new addiction

gunxsword · #**152** 04-26-2012, 11:54 PM

Can enemies, especially the jellies/blobs appear before the rupees!? I maxed my rupees skill at the 19th mission of the first map due to grinding, where most of my damage are taken from running INTO blobs hidden behind a blanket of rupees.

I LOVE RUPEES so please do something so I won't hate the sight of a floor littered with those delicious gems!

Benegesserit · #**153** 04-27-2012, 02:42 AM

only thing i have to admit i dont like is enemies being able to hit you the instant they spawn...especially in the corners...cards spawn there sometimes so you're forced to go there and sometimes eat an enemy spawn to the face

MJFox · #**154** 04-27-2012, 03:10 AM

not in austrian store... why?

greetings

MJFox

jeffyg3 · #**155** 04-27-2012, 04:25 AM

SBC got old exceptionally quick. This game is a hell of a lot better than the monotonous SBC. Very addicting, can't wait to play some more

Gabrien · #**156** 04-27-2012, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guise

Not to pick nits, but "anymore" is an accepted word in (American) English. I assume you're from the Australian oldschool. Yes, I realize this isn't a word usage forum but wanted to make that distinction.

From Miriam-Webster:
Although both anymore and any more are found in written use, in the 20th century anymore is the more common styling. Anymore is regularly used in negative <no one can be natural anymore — May Sarton>, interrogative <do you read much anymore?>, and conditional <if you do that anymore, I'll leave> contexts and in certain positive constructions <the Washingtonian is too sophisticated to believe anymore in solutions — Russell Baker>.

All that goes to show is that when enough people use a word incorrectly, for a long enough time, it eventually becomes accepted as the norm or a valid variant. Presumably because it is simpler to do so than battle mass ignorance.

Language is constantly evolving, and I do not mean to imply that it should remain static, but causes of its evolution can and should be closely examined as by far not all are equally valid or justified.

Up untill less than a century ago, language and its evolution were relatively safe, as the "unwashed masses" were largely illiterate and cared little about it. These days they care just as little, but have been educated enough to be in the position to affect its course. (Though not enough to understand the difference between "your" and "you're.)

Exact-Psience · #**157** 04-27-2012, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gabrien

All that goes to show is that when enough people use a word incorrectly, for a long enough time, it eventually becomes accepted as the norm or a valid variant. Presumably because it is simpler to do so than battle mass ignorance.

Language is constantly evolving, and I do not mean to imply that it should remain static, but causes of its evolution can and should be closely examined as by far not all are equally valid or justified.

Up untill less than a century ago, language and its evolution were relatively safe, as the "unwashed masses" were largely illiterate and cared little about it. These days they care just as little, but have been educated enough to be in the position to affect its course. (Though not enough to understand the difference between "your" and "you're.)

In other words, we should embrace change. It's what defines us humans.