| View Poll Results: Should Marijuana Be Legalized? | |||
| Yes |
|
198 | 59.64% |
| No |
|
134 | 40.36% |
| Voters: 332. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#791
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And, go to the same, or any other medical database and try and find data on beneficial effects of marijuana - there isn't much. Last edited by pluto6; 10-24-2011 at 08:16 PM.. |
|
#792
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
www.saferchoice.org/content/view/24/53/ I can provide more if you want.... I'm not saying everything should be legal. I'm just saying that it's retarded that weed is illegal while alcohol is perfectly legal. It makes zero sense. BTW, I'm a paraplegic (from a spinal cord injury), and it truly does help with my symptoms, so I've experienced the medical benefits first hand. Last edited by jeffy777; 10-25-2011 at 12:00 AM.. |
|
#793
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ok, so I am voicing an unpopular position - not surprising on a game board. And, while I personally have seen much more harm than good from marijuana, if the ongoing studies show that it is a relatively safe substance, than so be it. I think the decisions should be made with good data, and not emotions. And definitely not with anecdotal data - everyone's got their stories, and those are just that - stories. And your source unfortunately is devoted to making marijuana sound ok. Quoting studies that support your view is not scientific, it's cheating. You need to search the whole of literature - PubMed - it has over 20 million citations, and will give you articles - not an argument. Your source is not objective, it's biased, and therefore unreliable. The articles it uses - fine, but one is a story in the Washington Post - sorry, they don't do research as far as I know. Anyways - I probably won't convince anyone, and I'm not really trying to, but I think people should use reputable sources to get their data from before taking positions that affect hundreds of millions of people. Last edited by pluto6; 10-24-2011 at 09:14 PM.. |
|
#794
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anyway, how about harm to families and society? Drunk people get violent and reckless. They drive drunk, they start fights, they beat wives and children. And pot smokers? They giggle, they get hungry, they take a nap. |
|
#795
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pluto, even though they are very different, alcohol and marijuana can be compared because they are both drugs. Yes, there are some harmful side effects from weed (to the airways, for instance....it is smoke, after all....however, more and more people are turning to vaporizers or THC oils, so that takes away all the harmful effects of smoking), but it's pretty obvious that a LOT more harm comes from alcohol than weed. It's a fact. There's no getting around that, and that's why it's quite hypocritical to treat weed like it's somehow worse than alcohol and to send people to jail just for smoking a joint.....meanwhile people are free to get hammered all they want. Like I said, it just doesn't make sense, and it just shows how backwards our line of thinking can be, even with all of our modern science and technology.
|
|
#796
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And drug dependence causes plenty of harm to families. Most alcoholics don't destroy their families by hitting - they destroy them from making the drug more important than the family. The same thing happens with marijuana. Some marijuana info from government statistics. And, before you say it's not true - this is derived from survey information from the users themselves. http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofacts/marijuana.html Btw - NIH is National Institute of Health - they don't have a political axe to grind. |
|
#797
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Alcohol has major problems - no doubt - I find it fascinating so much public awareness is spent on say - breast cancer - women have a lifetime risk of about 1 in 8 so it's significant - but 10 % of the whole country has alcohol problems and where are the campaigns? Where are the ribbons, where's the media? I agree that alcohol has problems, but saying they are both drugs - ok which is worse - aspirin or Tylenol? Sort of depends on what you mean by worse - aspirin causes bleeding issues - Tylenol can cause liver and kidney problems - which is worse? Which is better? Aspirin saves lives due to it's anti clotting properties, Tylenol relieves fever (without causing Reyes syndrome - related to aspirin), and is a relatively safe pain reliever for the elderly. They both are good and bad. Alcohol has good properties and bad, so does marijuana - you are making value judgements on what you consider to be worse that may not be shared by others. That is why I say you can't compare them. |
|
#798
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree that marijuana has it's problems, just like any drug....but I just don't see any good reason why it should remain illegal when it's not any worse than alcohol, with a lot of studies pointing to it being much less harmful. It should at least be decriminalized. Last edited by jeffy777; 10-24-2011 at 10:23 PM.. |
|
#799
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Leothwyn; 10-24-2011 at 10:18 PM.. |
|
#800
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok - one last thing to think about - concerning which is worse.
Let's just say you live in a city - say 50,000 people. And in that city there are 3 murders each year, and 500 burglaries. If you survey people - which is worse - murder or burglary - most people (I'm assuming) will say murder. But if you survey your town, which they consider a bigger problem - they would likely say burglary - it happens much more frequently. Turn it around and make burglaries few and murders many, and you have a double whammy. Alcohol is used regularly by 52% of adults over age 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_249.pdf). So with 330 million Americans - not sure of adult population but let's say it's half even though it is likely much higher than that. So, 80 million people drink, compared with about 14 million people that smoke weed. Which is more likely to be a problem - regardless of the "seriousness"? Of course there are going to be lots ,ore alcohol issues - there are 5 times as many people who drink. And, what are the alcohol issues that make the press? DUI, child and spouse abuse, etc. You don't hear about the marijuana issues because the numbers pale in comparison - just like you would not hear about the occasional murder - or it would be quickly forgotten because the nect day there would be news on 2 or 3 more burglaries. ( and I am likely overemphasizing my point, because I in no way am trying to say marijuana use is as bad as, or related to murder) Anyways, alcohol has problems - it affects every organ system adversely when over used. Dependence ruins millions of lives, families suffer terribly, the children are more likely to be alcoholic (15 % lifetime incidence of becoming dependent). Drunk drivers kill thousands of people. But, how do you know the same thing would not happen when 80 million people are using marijuana? We may not see issues because the numbers are small, and the numbers have always been small when compared with alcohol. Maybe marijuana causes all sorts of issues that come up when a significant part of the population uses it? Of the 14 million people that use marijuana, about 6-7 million either meet abuse, or dependence criteria by the DSM IV, so marijuana looks to be addictive in half the population that uses it. Imagine if alcohol had addiction of 50%. Only about 10%. So we will have 40 million or more people addicted to marijuana - is that good? Even if it's "safe" and all people do is get giggly, and even if they don't get in car accidents? Addiction of any form is a terrible disease and takes a toll on the individual, their families, friends, and society. There are huge costs both monetary, and non monetary treating, or not treating. Anyways, I'm going to bed. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|