Support our Sponsors:

Go Back   Touch Arcade > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2014, 08:30 PM
Papa Deuce Papa Deuce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 315
Default So, THIS might REALLY be why Apple bought Beats.

So, now it looks like we know another big reason Apple bought Beats. From Forbes:

[Editor's note: The original headline stated as fact that Apple was abandoning the headphone jack. This is informed opinion, so we added a question mark.]

Suddenly why Apple AAPL +0.39% spent a seemingly ludicrous $3.2 billion buying Beats is starting to make sense. The reason: Apple is being more Apple than we ever imagined and it could mean saying goodbye to your favourite pair of headphones. Furthermore, if my theory is correct, then the new ones you buy will probably have Beats on the logo.

Get Ready For Lightning Headphones
Like most Apple developments, the news emerged from a leak. 9to5Mac has learnt that Apple submitted a specification to its MFi (Made For) licensing program for headphones which connect using the company’s proprietary Lightning port instead of the standard 3.5mm jack. Furthermore all it will take for the Lightning port to start accepting these new headphones is a firmware update.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2014, 08:36 PM
coolpepper43 coolpepper43 is offline
Senior Member
iPad mini 2, iOS 7.x
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa Deuce View Post
So, now it looks like we know another big reason Apple bought Beats. From Forbes:

[Editor's note: The original headline stated as fact that Apple was abandoning the headphone jack. This is informed opinion, so we added a question mark.]

Suddenly why Apple AAPL +0.39% spent a seemingly ludicrous $3.2 billion buying Beats is starting to make sense. The reason: Apple is being more Apple than we ever imagined and it could mean saying goodbye to your favourite pair of headphones. Furthermore, if my theory is correct, then the new ones you buy will probably have Beats on the logo.

Get Ready For Lightning Headphones
Like most Apple developments, the news emerged from a leak. 9to5Mac has learnt that Apple submitted a specification to its MFi (Made For) licensing program for headphones which connect using the company’s proprietary Lightning port instead of the standard 3.5mm jack. Furthermore all it will take for the Lightning port to start accepting these new headphones is a firmware update.
Omg! Are you freaking serious! If I can't use my nice pair of iem than this is pretty ridiculous. Is that what's happening? Great find!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2014, 09:36 PM
Connector Connector is offline
Banned
iPad (4th Gen), iOS 7.x
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In the Chatroom
Posts: 15,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa Deuce View Post
So, now it looks like we know another big reason Apple bought Beats. From Forbes:

[Editor's note: The original headline stated as fact that Apple was abandoning the headphone jack. This is informed opinion, so we added a question mark.]

Suddenly why Apple AAPL +0.39% spent a seemingly ludicrous $3.2 billion buying Beats is starting to make sense. The reason: Apple is being more Apple than we ever imagined and it could mean saying goodbye to your favourite pair of headphones. Furthermore, if my theory is correct, then the new ones you buy will probably have Beats on the logo.

Get Ready For Lightning Headphones
Like most Apple developments, the news emerged from a leak. 9to5Mac has learnt that Apple submitted a specification to its MFi (Made For) licensing program for headphones which connect using the company’s proprietary Lightning port instead of the standard 3.5mm jack. Furthermore all it will take for the Lightning port to start accepting these new headphones is a firmware update.
Lightning headphones?

I hope not, that would be one of the worst things ever on ios.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2014, 11:18 PM
Gov Gov is offline
Banned
iPhone 5s, iOS 7.x
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,264
Default

What! I just bought $1k headphones (AKG K3003i) 3.5 jack headphones..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2014, 01:56 AM
Mene Mene is offline
Senior Member
iPad Air, iOS 7.x
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,758
Default

If they did that, I for one would never buy any.

I have some 'Atari' branded headphones I picked up for £20, I wouldn't pay their ridiculous price for those, I'd do without.
Tbh I'd never pay more than £20-30 for headphones. (Approx $30-45)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:25 AM
sweetdiss sweetdiss is offline
Senior Member
iPhone 5, iOS 6.x
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,331
Default

Ain't gonna happen. How would you listen to a movie or whatever in headphones if you are charging your device at the same time? There will always be some kind of headphone jack/port separate from the lightning port.

I think the acquisition has more to do with music in general rather than just fancy headphones.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2014, 07:56 AM
squarezero squarezero is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 10,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetdiss View Post
Ain't gonna happen. How would you listen to a movie or whatever in headphones if you are charging your device at the same time? There will always be some kind of headphone jack/port separate from the lightning port.

I think the acquisition has more to do with music in general rather than just fancy headphones.
Agreed on your logical take on this "story." But the purchase (which was kind of a bargain for Apple, considering Beats yearly revenues) was also very much about brand value, especially outside of Apple's traditional audience. Check out Beats new, epic World Cup ad to see what I mean.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2014, 10:48 AM
Papa Deuce Papa Deuce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarezero View Post
Agreed on your logical take on this "story." But the purchase (which was kind of a bargain for Apple, considering Beats yearly revenues) was also very much about brand value, especially outside of Apple's traditional audience. Check out Beats new, epic World Cup ad to see what I mean.
And about $250 profit on all those $300 sets of Beats.... I posted here about how Beats cost $14 - $35 in parts based on which model.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2014, 03:16 PM
crunc crunc is offline
👮 Spam Police 🚓
iPhone 4
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,078
Default

This rumor sounds completely ludicrous.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2014, 04:57 PM
Papa Deuce Papa Deuce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crunc View Post
This rumor sounds completely ludicrous.
Well, Forbes magazine is not known for rumors. If they said it, they believe it to be true.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 2012, TouchArcade.com, LLC.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2008 - 2011, TouchArcade.com. Privacy Policy / DMCA Copyright Agent