Originally Posted by Rocketman919
It's funny how a kid like you questioned someone's age. IRONY!
Also you talked about how Nolan hasn't made enough movies to be considered "great" and then you cited Tarantino as a person who is? Well guess what, they've each directed 7 feature films, and Nolan has directed more than Tarantino if you count both parts of Kill Bill as one movie.
And you are a real idiot if you judge a director based on the number of films they make.
Nolan has more films on the user-delegated IMDB top 250 movies than Cameron, Coppola, Scorcese, or Fincher. Hell, even you said that you "like three of his movies and the rest are above average." Show me another director who can make three great films and have the rest still be really good. I can think of practically no other director who has yet to make a bad film.
Follwing and Insomnia were just average. But your right, no bad movies yet.
Tarentino made Kill Bill 1, Kill Bill 2, Inglourious Bastards, Resovoir Dogs, and Pulp Fiction that were A grade. Nolan had 3. I consider Tarentino better because he may have directed the same amount of movies, but more that stand out. Listen, the first Harry Potter movie was released in 2001. That would make the kid 14-15ish most likely, and it was just weird to hear about someone growing up with Harry Potter. Usually, you hear Jaws, or Toy Story. I guess pretty soon we will be hearing about someone growing up with the Transformers movies.